To kill a mockingbird by Harper Lee (CHAPTER 4–PART 2)

……………………………………………….“Let’s roll in the tire,” I suggested.
Jem sighed. “You know I’m too big.”
“You c’n push.”
I ran to the back yard and pulled an old car tire from under the house. I slapped it
up to the front yard. “I’m first,” I said.
Dill said he ought to be first, he ju.st got here.
Jem arbitrated, awarded me first push with an extra time for Dill, and I folded
myself inside the tire.
Until it happened I did not realize that Jem was offended by my contradicting him
on Hot Steams, and that he was patiently awaiting an opportunity to reward me.
He did, by pushing the tire down the sidewalk with all the force in his body.
Ground, sky and houses melted into a mad palette, my ears throbbed, I was
suffocating. I could not put out my hands to stop, they were wedged between my
chest and knees. I could only hope that Jem would outrun the tire and me, or that I
would be stopped by a bump in the sidewalk. I heard him behind me, chasing and
shouting.
The tire bumped on gravel, skeetered across the road, crashed into a barrier and
popped me like a cork onto pavement. Dizzy and nauseated, I lay on the cement
and shook my head still, pounded my ears to silence, and heard Jem’s voice:
“Scout, get away from there, come on!”
I raised my head and stared at the Radley Place steps in front of me. I froze.
“Come on, Scout, don’t just lie there!” Jem was screaming. “Get up, can’tcha?”
I got to my feet, trembling as I thawed.
“Get the tire!” Jem hollered. “Bring it with you! Ain’t you got any sense at all?”
When I was able to navigate, I ran back to them as fast as my shaking knees
would carry me.
“Why didn’t you bring it?” Jem yelled.
“Why don’t you get it?” I screamed.
Jem was silent.
“Go on, it ain’t far inside the gate. Why, you even touched the house once, remember?”
Jem looked at me furiously, could not decline, ran down the sidewalk, treaded
water at the gate, then dashed in and retrieved the tire.
“See there?” Jem was scowling triumphantly. “Nothin‘ to it. I swear, Scout,
sometimes you act so much like a girl it’s mortifyin’.”
There was more to it than he knew, but I decided not to tell him.
Calpurnia appeared in the front door and yelled, “Lemonade time! You all get in
outa that hot sun ‘fore you fry alive!” Lemonade in the middle of the morning was
a summertime ritual. Calpurnia set a pitcher and three glasses on the porch, then
went about her business. Being out of Jem’s good graces did not worry me
especially. Lemonade would restore his good humor.
Jem gulped down his second glassful and slapped his chest. “I know what we are
going to play,” he announced. “Something new, something different.”
“What?” asked Dill.
“Boo Radley.”
Jem’s head at times was transparent: he had thought that up to make me
understand he wasn’t afraid of Radleys in any shape or form, to contrast his own
fearless heroism with my cowardice.
“Boo Radley? How?” asked Dill.
Jem said, “Scout, you can be Mrs. Radley-”
“I declare if I will. I don’t think-”
“‘Smatter?” said Dill. “Still scared?”
“He can get out at night when we’re all asleep…” I said.
Jem hissed. “Scout, how’s he gonna know what we’re doin‘? Besides, I don’t
think he’s still there. He died years ago and they stuffed him up the chimney.”
Dill said, “Jem, you and me can play and Scout can watch if she’s scared.”
I was fairly sure Boo Radley was inside that house, but I couldn’t prove it, and
felt it best to keep my mouth shut or I would be accused of believing in Hot
Steams, phenomena I was immune to in the daytime.
Jem parceled out our roles: I was Mrs. Radley, and all I had to do was come out and sweep the porch. Dill was old Mr. Radley: he walked up and down the
sidewalk and coughed when Jem spoke to him. Jem, naturally, was Boo: he went
under the front steps and shrieked and howled from time to time.
As the summer progressed, so did our game. We polished and perfected it, added
dialogue and plot until we had manufactured a small play upon which we rang
changes every day.
Dill was a villain’s villain: he could get into any character part assigned him, and
appear tall if height was part of the devilry required. He was as good as his worst
performance; his worst performance was Gothic. I reluctantly played assorted
ladies who entered the script. I never thought it as much fun as Tarzan, and I
played that summer with more than vague anxiety despite Jem’s assurances that
Boo Radley was dead and nothing would get me, with him and Calpurnia there in
the daytime and Atticus home at night.
Jem was a born hero.
It was a melancholy little drama, woven from bits and scraps of gossip and
neighborhood legend: Mrs. Radley had been beautiful until she married Mr.
Radley and lost all her money. She also lost most of her teeth, her hair, and her
right forefinger (Dill’s contribution. Boo bit it off one night when he couldn’t find
any cats and squirrels to eat.); she sat in the livingroom and cried most of the
time, while Boo slowly whittled away all the furniture in the house.
The three of us were the boys who got into trouble; I was the probate judge, for a
change; Dill led Jem away and crammed him beneath the steps, poking him with
the brushbroom. Jem would reappear as needed in the shapes of the sheriff,
assorted townsfolk, and Miss Stephanie Crawford, who had more to say about the
Radleys than anybody in Maycomb.
When it was time to play Boo’s big scene, Jem would sneak into the house, steal
the scissors from the sewing-machine drawer when Calpurnia’s back was turned,
then sit in the swing and cut up newspapers. Dill would walk by, cough at Jem,
and Jem would fake a plunge into Dill’s thigh. From where I stood it looked real.
When Mr. Nathan Radley passed us on his daily trip to town, we would stand still
and silent until he was out of sight, then wonder what he would do to us if he
suspected. Our activities halted when any of the neighbors appeared, and once I saw Miss Maudie Atkinson staring across the street at us, her hedge clippers
poised in midair.
One day we were so busily playing Chapter XXV, Book II of One Man’s Family,
we did not see Atticus standing on the sidewalk looking at us, slapping a rolled
magazine against his knee. The sun said twelve noon.
“What are you all playing?” he asked.
“Nothing,” said Jem.
Jem’s evasion told me our game was a secret, so I kept quiet.
“What are you doing with those scissors, then? Why are you tearing up that
newspaper? If it’s today’s I’ll tan you.”
“Nothing.”
“Nothing what?” said Atticus.
“Nothing, sir.”
“Give me those scissors,” Atticus said. “They’re no things to play with. Does this
by any chance have anything to do with the Radleys?”
“No sir,” said Jem, reddening.
“I hope it doesn’t,” he said shortly, and went inside the house.
“Je-m…”
“Shut up! He’s gone in the livingroom, he can hear us in there.”
Safely in the yard, Dill asked Jem if we could play any more.
“I don’t know. Atticus didn’t say we couldn’t-”
“Jem,” I said, “I think Atticus knows it anyway.”
“No he don’t. If he did he’d say he did.”
I was not so sure, but Jem told me I was being a girl, that girls always imagined
things, that’s why other people hated them so, and if I started behaving like one I
could just go off and find some to play with.
“All right, you just keep it up then,” I said. “You’ll find out.”
Atticus’s arrival was the second reason I wanted to quit the game. The first reason
happened the day I rolled into the Radley front yard. Through all the head-shaking, quelling of nausea and Jem-yelling, I had heard another sound, so low I
could not have heard it from the sidewalk. Someone inside the house was
laughing.

9 thoughts on “To kill a mockingbird by Harper Lee (CHAPTER 4–PART 2)”

  1. Blood Libels defines the Yatzir Ha’Raw spirits within the hearts of all Goyim throughout the generations. Post the Oct 7th Abomination massacre by Hamas, almost immediately came the blood libel slander of “Genocide”. But post the ’67 War the blood libel revisionist history introduced by both Britain and France: the 242 declaration that peace only achievable in the Middle East through a UN “internatioanal law” dictate upon Israel!

    The semantic shift in the phrase “territoires occupés” between 1964 and post-1967 UN usage exposes the deliberate retroactive redefinition that Arab and European diplomats engineered after the Six-Day War. The Palestine National Covenant (1964)—ratified three years before 242—defines “Palestine” as the “occupied” land within the British Mandate borders, excluding the West Bank (then under Jordanian sovereignty) and Gaza (under Egyptian control).

    Weigh now the hostile blood libel language of “the” French UN 242 post war revisionist history. The French official text uses “des territoires occupés” — which in French usage is normally read as “from “the” occupied territories” (i.e., with “the” definite sense). That phrasing more naturally supports the French holier than thou, reading that Israel should withdraw from the territories (the entirety of those occupied in 1948! The French wording and the preamble’s “inadmissibility of acquisition of territory by war” buttress an interpretation that envisages full withdrawal, which includes even West Jerusalem! Recall the Vatican demanded in 1947 the Jerusalem exist as an Internationally ruled City, similar to Post WWII Berlin. Many continental and Arab states, and many subsequent UN framings, preferred this reading.

    The French text gave political cover to states and blocs pressing for “the” full Israeli withdrawal from “48 occupied territories”; the English text gave the drafters (Caradon, Goldberg et al.) a way to frame 242 as a negotiating framework rather than an immediate, absolute mandate for total withdrawal from ’67 “recaptured territories”. A fundamental presumption by both London and Paris. Both versions fundamentally err. Israel simply not a UN protectorate territory wherein the UN determines its borders like as attempted by the Peel Commission. Britain and France, nor any other UN Security Council States, determine the international borders of Israel. And how much more so the Capital City of Israel. Yet these hostile states promote revisionist history and refuse to recognize Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel! Both versions of UN 242 an utter fraud.

    Hence the distinction between the British and French versions of 242 represents a Good Cop vs. Bad Cop propaganda rhetoric to justify the dismantling of Zionism’s pre WWI platform that Jews have equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. All Arab Israeli Wars ever fought, including the Oct 7th Abomination War reflects the Blood Libel Racism spirits which breaths within the Yatzir Ha’Raw hearts of all Goyim – both Arab/Muslims and European/Russians.

  2. Dear Martha
    Your posts are as vibrant as Diwali festival, festival of lights. I greet you on Diwali & thank you for liking my post ‘Poet2’. 🌷🌷🌹

  3. Oh my goodness! a tremendous article dude. Thank you However I am experiencing challenge with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anyone getting similar rss problem? Anyone who is aware of kindly respond. Thnkx

Leave a Reply to Backlinks Que Son Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top